My Photo
Blog powered by TypePad

Subscribe

  • Subscribe in podnova

    Add SourcingTalk to ODEO

TPI - Legal Disclaimer & Privacy Policy


  • This Web site is for the purpose of disseminating information, which may include confidential and or proprietary data. Such information is entitled to the protection specified therein, but does not represent an offer by TPI to perform any services as such an obligation only arises pursuant to an agreement specific to the parties covering the terms and conditions applicable to such services.
  • TPI's Legal Disclaimer
  • TPI's Web Privacy Policy Statement

« Think Outside the Indian Sourcing Box | Main | Listening to the Buy-Side »

May 06, 2008

Pulling the Renegotiation Levers

Dale Hearn of TPI’s Financial Analysis Services Group will be "blogging about the bottom line" this week.

Dale_hearn Of the many factors that come into play during sourcing decision-making, financial drivers within the existing contract are critical.

Companies must decide whether to renegotiate their contract with their current provider (re-source), choose a new service provider, or bring the services back in house (in-source). Several clients that I worked with over the past couple of years made a conscience decision to renegotiate with their current service provider based solely on the overall financial implications of the deal.  For more information, check out my colleague's whitepaper.

Service levels, client satisfaction surveys, balance of trade issues, and executive relationships all had an impact in renegotiations, but the most important factors for these clients were based on the NPV (net present value) and profit margins over the term of the deal.


History shows that most companies with outsourcing agreements will undergo significant restructuring during the term, a majority within the first 3 to 4 years, and most (75 percent) with the incumbent service provider.  Furthermore, most of the remainder is re-sourced rather than in-sourced, and only a very small number are in such trouble that litigation is pursued.

When renegotiating a contract, companies should consider financial flexibility and control as part of the overall process.  Providers may not like this approach, but it will pay significant dividends in the long-run for the client.  Examples of financial leverage include eliminating exclusivity restrictions, reducing termination for convenience costs, rights to use third parties, benchmarking rights and lower minimum commitments.

Service providers might be reluctant, especially when financial benefits are reaped by their client, but they know financial drivers are not the only factors when renegotiating a contract.  Other dynamics must be considered, such as increased service incentives, ability to add or change service levels (increased revenues to the supplier), and the potential for a healthy relationship that fosters and facilitates future growth or international expansion.

Renegotiation should be approached as a normal and necessary adjustment to changing conditions.  Financial flexibility and effective management of the supplier relationship are key to the long-term success of a deal.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834520e4c69e200e5522a68b08834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Pulling the Renegotiation Levers :

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment